Australian PC User contributing editor
Blackle vs Google power savings – the final test
[24 March 2009: This story was uploaded from my original Techlogg.com website. In the interests of readers, we uploaded it here with details about the power tests we carried out.]
We’ve boosted our testing to now include 27 monitors so we’re now pretty certain we know what to expect after our final series of tests.
UPDATE 31 March 2008: Hi everyone. Some respondents have mentioned that LCD brightness has an affect on power consumption. Well, it certainly does. We carried out a small test last October and wrote up the results in a story called “Backlight consumes two-thirds of LCD monitor power”
Our tests on Blackle versus Google has been reported on by major newspapers and sites around the world. Well, while a few people have managed to pull out a monitor or two to test how much power they consume running the two search sites, we think we’ll have to last word.
27 monitors.
Yep, we’ve tested 27 monitors, including some 23 LCD monitors, to find out once and for all how both of these search engines stack up on monitor power consumption.
We’ve taken a range of sizes and brands to try and get the most reliable test results possible.
There’s no argument that on CRT monitors, Blackle does reduce the power consumption but it’s not by the 15-watts claimed. We tested the four CRT monitors we could get our hands on and found that only one unit, an older 22-inch Compaq, showed the 15-watts or more power differential.
But with the LCD monitor market penetration worldwide now beyond 75%, it’s the LCD monitor power consumption that’s just as, if not more, important.
The most interesting aspect we found was that of the LCD monitors we tested of size 22-inches or less, all showed an increase in power consumption using Blackle. Beyond the 22-inch mark however, five of the six models showed a fractional decrease in power consumption when using Blackle, except the ViewSonic VX2835wm, which showed a 2.2-watt increase.
For the five that dropped their power consumption, the average drop was 3.16-watts, again, not the 15-watts being suggested.
But for the sake of fairness, here’s what we suggest – if you’re using a CRT monitor, you can save some power by using Blackle however it won’t be as much as its supporters will have you believe. We still think it’s around half.
If you’re using a 22-inch or smaller LCD screen, stick with Google if you want to keep power consumption to a minimum. However, if you have a 24-inch or larger LCD monitor, on average, Blackle is the cheaper option but it’s not a guarantee – as we said, we found one 28-inch LCD monitor that bucked that trend.
However, the power consumption difference between Google and Blackle on all 23 LCD monitors was as small as you could get – an increase of 100mW (0.1Watts). So after all that testing, we’re in a better position to say that anyone else that Blackle makes next to no difference, on average, with LCD monitors.
If you’re really serious about saving energy, here’s just a couple of tips that will make far more difference: switch off your computer at the end of the day and don’t bother with a screensaver, because every screensaver costs power to run.
Darren Yates is a B.Sc. (electronics) graduate of Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
| Monitor | Size (inch) |
Resolution (pixels) | Google (watts) |
Blackle (watts) |
Power difference (watts) |
| LCD models | |||||
| LG SW570LE | 15 | 1024×768 | 26.2 | 26.5 | -0.3 |
| AOC LM721 | 17 | 1280×1024 | 33.1 | 33.5 | -0.4 |
| Acer AL1916W | 19 | 1440×900 | 28.3 | 28.8 | -0.5 |
| BenQ FP93G | 19 | 1280×1024 | 31.1 | 31.9 | -0.8 |
| LG L1917S | 19 | 1440×900 | 33.3 | 33.4 | -0.1 |
| LG L192WS | 19 | 1440×900 | 24.5 | 25.1 | -0.6 |
| LG L196W | 19 | 1440×900 | 38.6 | 39.7 | -1.1 |
| ViewSonic VX1932wm | 19 | 1440×900 | 35.5 | 36 | -0.5 |
| Asus VW202 | 20 | 1680×1050 | 35.7 | 37.2 | -1.5 |
| BenQ FP202W | 20 | 1680×1050 | 43.6 | 44.3 | -0.7 |
| Acer AL2216W | 22 | 1680×1050 | 30.5 | 32 | -1.5 |
| Asus PG221 | 22 | 1680×1050 | 54.9 | 55.9 | -1 |
| Asus VW222 | 22 | 1680×1050 | 43.2 | 43.4 | -0.2 |
| BenQ FP222W | 22 | 1680×1050 | 40.7 | 41.9 | -1.2 |
| LG L226W | 22 | 1680×1050 | 39.9 | 42 | -2.1 |
| Samsung 226BW | 22 | 1680×1050 | 43.6 | 44.8 | -1.2 |
| ViewSonic VX2255wmh | 22 | 1680×1050 | 41.3 | 42.4 | -1.1 |
| BenQ FP241W | 24 | 1920×1200 | 87.4 | 85.2 | 2.2 |
| Dell 2407WFP-HC | 24 | 1920×1200 | 82.7 | 81.3 | 1.4 |
| NEC LCD2490WUXi | 24 | 1920×1200 | 73.7 | 69.6 | 4.1 |
| NEC LCD2690WUXi | 26 | 1920×1200 | 89.3 | 85.2 | 4.1 |
| ViewSonic VX2835wm | 28 | 1920×1200 | 106.8 | 109 | -2.2 |
| Samsung 305T | 30 | 2560×1600 | 111.5 | 107.5 | 4 |
| AVERAGES | 51.1 | 51.2 | -0.1 | ||
| CRT models | |||||
| Acer AC915 | 19 | 1280×1024 | 75.9 | 64.6 | 11.3 |
| Compaq P1210 | 22 | 1280×960 | 112.6 | 96.2 | 16.4 |
| Digital PCXBV-HY | 15 | 1024×768 | 73.6 | 65.1 | 8.5 |
| Mitsubishi DV1770 | 17 | 1024×768 | 72.5 | 65.4 | 7.1 |
| AVERAGES | 83.7 | 72.8 | 10.8 |
Similar Posts:
- Dropping brightness levels can save 10-watts continuously, reduce power consumption.
- Black & white power consumption – 24 more LCD monitors tested
- Q&A – Do black-screen search websites use less power?
- Q&A – What’s the iPad’s power consumption?
- Q&A – What are the best ways to save power with my computer?
- Picking the right wattage in a PC power supply unit (PSU)
- The 22-inch LCD monitor goes HD
- Q&A – What does PMPO stand for?
- REVIEW – BenQ G2400WD 24-inch widescreen LCD
- LED lamps begin lighting up Australian homes
Social Media buttons brought to you by S-ButtonZ (WordPress Plugin)
| Print article | This entry was posted by Darren Yates on March 24, 2009 at 10:48 am, and is filed under Education, Internet, PC User - what's coming up, Uncategorized, environment. Follow any responses to this post through RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback from your own site. |

about 7 months ago
What are your thoughts on the new end-to-end carbon neutral search engine http://www.neutroodle.com ?
Reply