Australian PC User contributing editor
India’s Tata Nano – bargain-priced motoring?
In the late-40’s, Germany built the first “people’s car” in the Famed Volkswagen Beetle.
Nearly 70 years on, Indian carmaker Tata Motors is hoping to repeat history with what has to be the world’s cheapest new car.
The release of the Tata Nano is certainly the freshest thing to happen to the global car market in years.
At a time when US car makers have their backs to the wall, the Tata Group seems to have come up with a winning combination of features and price – well, okay, price.
The fact that the Indian market can support a small two-cylinder, four-door car that sells for just 100,000 rupees (about AUD$2800) shows that its own low manufacturing costs don’t do it any harm. It’s certainly unlikely that even with the clever engineering incorporating inside the Nano that such a car could be made for this price anywhere else in the world.
With a 623-cc two-cylinder rear-mount motor and four-speed manual transmission, the base 100,000-rupee model doesn’t buy you much more than basic motoring – no air-conditioning, no power-steering, no power-assisted brakes. However, when you consider that you’re still actually getting an actual car for this price, it’s still surprisingly good value.
It’s the sort of price Australia hasn’t seen for a new small car since the early-70s.
The Tata Group has plans to release an “international” model however it remains to be seen whether it would pass the NSW RTA’s safety assessments before we see them whizzing along Australian streets.
You can see more pics and get more details at the Tata Motors website (english).
It’s nice that it’s already a right-hand-drive – that would be one step closer to passing Australian safety tests… :)
[NOTE: Sorry, this isn't a tech story but hey, it's a good-news motoring story and there haven't been many of those lately...]
Tata Motors already has the specifications of the Nano up on its website but in detail:
Dimensions
Overall Length |
3099 mm |
Overall Width |
1495 mm (& 1620 mm with ORVM) |
Overall Height |
1652 mm |
Wheelbase |
2230 mm |
Ground clearance |
180 mm |
Min. Turning Circle Radius |
4 m |
Seating Capacity |
4 persons |
Fuel Tank Capacity |
15 Liters |
Kerb Weight |
|
Nano |
600 kg |
Nano CX |
615 kg |
Nano LX |
635 kg |
Payload |
300 kg |
Engine and transmission
Engine Type |
624 cc, 2 cylinder, MPFI |
Maximum Engine Output |
35 PS @ 5250 rpm |
Maximum Torque |
48 NM @ 3000 +/-500 rpm |
Maximum Speed |
105 kmph |
Gradeability |
30% |
Transmission |
Synchromesh on all forward gears,? sliding mesh on reverse gear with overdrive on 4th gear |
No. of Gears |
4 Forward + 1 Reverse |
Suspension
Front |
Independent, Lower Wishbone, McPherson Strut with gas filled dampers |
Rear |
Independent, Semi Trailing arm with coil spring & gas filled shock absorbers |
Brakes
Brake Type |
Dual Circuit, Vertical Split operated by tandem master cylinder |
Nano CX |
With Vacuum Booster |
Nano LX |
With Vacuum Booster |
Front |
180 mm dia. drum brake |
Rear |
180 mm dia. drum brake |
Wheels & Tyres
Tyre Type |
Radial & Tubeless |
Front Tyre size |
135/70 R12 |
Rear tyre size |
155/65 R12 |
Spare tyre size |
135/70 R12 |
Wheels |
4 B x 12 |
Similar Posts:
- Apple releases new iPods
- Q&A – What’s the difference between SD, SDHC and SDXC cards?
- Floor drops out of flash memory prices but iPods don’t follow suit
- Apple releases “limited edition” 4GB iPod nano 4G – but won’t sell it
- Aussie dollar to drop to 40cents US?
- Apple’s new nano 5G – has it got it right finally?
- Q&A – Which rechargeable batteries should I buy for my digital camera?
- LCD TVs “obsolete on May 1″? Don’t bet on it.
- REVIEW: Sony VAIO VPC-L118FG All-in-One PC
- Samsung announces 3D TV prices and availability
Social Media buttons brought to you by S-ButtonZ (WordPress Plugin)
| Print article | This entry was posted by Darren Yates on March 24, 2009 at 9:36 pm, and is filed under Motoring (yep, not tech but hey). Follow any responses to this post through RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback from your own site. |
about 1 year ago
Good piece.
Reply